
Editors: Cathy
Chua and Robert Zajac Bulletin #9
|
43rd PABF
Championships - Open Series 2nd Round Robin (FINAL) |
|
1 |
|
|
431 |
|
1.8080 |
|
2 |
Chinese |
|
382 |
|
1.3524 |
|
3 |
|
|
365 |
|
1.2009 |
|
4 |
|
|
350.5 |
|
1.1481 |
|
5 |
|
|
350 |
|
1.1148 |
|
6 |
|
|
346 |
|
1.0984 |
|
7 |
|
|
338 |
|
1.0367 |
|
8 |
|
|
321 |
|
0.9916 |
|
9 |
|
|
295.5 |
|
0.8751 |
|
10 |
|
|
262 |
|
0.6960 |
|
11 |
|
|
254 |
|
0.6789 |
|
12 |
|
|
234 |
|
0.6255 |
|
Round 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
Chinese |
47 |
- |
39 |
16 |
- |
14 |
|
|
- |
|
53 |
- |
22 |
21 |
- |
9 |
|
|
- |
|
28 |
- |
48 |
11 |
- |
19 |
|
|
- |
|
104 |
- |
20 |
25 |
- |
0 |
|
|
- |
|
40 |
- |
21 |
19 |
- |
11 |
|
|
- |
|
60 |
- |
34 |
20 |
- |
10 |
|
Round 11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
49 |
- |
26 |
20 |
- |
10 |
|
Chinese |
- |
|
18 |
- |
47 |
9 |
- |
21 |
|
|
- |
|
25 |
- |
50 |
10 |
- |
20 |
|
|
- |
|
26 |
- |
74 |
5 |
- |
25 |
|
|
- |
|
49 |
- |
61 |
13 |
- |
17 |
|
|
- |
|
19 |
- |
41 |
10 |
- |
20 |
Open Series Playoff Results after 1st Segment
|
Open Series |
Segment |
Total |
|||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
||
|
Chinese |
31 |
﹛ |
﹛ |
﹛ |
31 |
|
|
32 |
﹛ |
﹛ |
﹛ |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Open Series |
Segment |
Total |
|||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
||
|
|
4 |
﹛ |
﹛ |
﹛ |
4 |
|
|
60 |
﹛ |
﹛ |
﹛ |
60 |
Ladies Series Playoff Results after 1st Segment
|
Ladies Series |
Segment |
Total |
|||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
||
|
|
37 |
﹛ |
﹛ |
﹛ |
37 |
|
|
26 |
﹛ |
﹛ |
﹛ |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ladies Series |
Segment |
Total |
|||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
||
|
|
22 |
﹛ |
﹛ |
﹛ |
22 |
|
|
48 |
﹛ |
﹛ |
﹛ |
48 |
Youth Series Playoff Results after 1st Segment
|
Youth Series |
Segment |
Total |
|||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
||
|
|
20 |
﹛ |
﹛ |
﹛ |
20 |
|
Chinese |
54 |
﹛ |
﹛ |
﹛ |
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Youth Series |
Segment |
Total |
|||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
||
|
|
31 |
﹛ |
﹛ |
﹛ |
31 |
|
|
45 |
﹛ |
﹛ |
﹛ |
45 |
|
43rd PABF
Championships – Senior Series 2nd Round Robin (FINAL) |
|
Ranking ( |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
VP |
|
IMP Quotient |
|
1 |
|
|
507 |
|
1.8778 |
|
2 |
|
|
483 |
|
1.6272 |
|
3 |
|
|
467 |
|
1.5806 |
|
4 |
Chinese |
|
460.5 |
|
1.4691 |
|
5 |
|
|
445 |
|
1.2930 |
|
6 |
|
|
429 |
|
1.2653 |
|
7 |
|
|
406 |
|
1.1760 |
|
8 |
Queens & Knight |
|
399 |
|
1.0968 |
|
9 |
|
|
349 |
|
0.8482 |
|
10 |
|
|
316 |
|
0.7069 |
|
11 |
|
|
309 |
|
0.6620 |
|
12 |
|
|
301 |
|
0.6632 |
|
13 |
|
|
273 |
|
0.5626 |
|
14 |
|
|
259.5 |
|
0.5485 |
|
Round 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
20 |
- |
29 |
13 |
- |
17 |
|
|
- |
Chinese |
34 |
- |
35 |
15 |
- |
15 |
|
|
- |
|
67 |
- |
17 |
25 |
- |
4 |
|
|
- |
|
27 |
- |
42 |
12 |
- |
18 |
|
|
- |
Queens & Knight |
5 |
- |
62 |
3 |
- |
25 |
|
|
- |
|
32 |
- |
55 |
10 |
- |
20 |
|
|
- |
|
45 |
- |
22 |
20 |
- |
10 |
|
Round 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
Chinese |
15 |
- |
46 |
8 |
- |
22 |
|
|
- |
|
21 |
- |
48 |
9 |
- |
21 |
|
|
- |
|
63 |
- |
41 |
20 |
- |
10 |
|
Queens & Knight |
- |
|
32 |
- |
17 |
18 |
- |
12 |
|
|
- |
|
6 |
- |
91 |
0 |
- |
25 |
|
|
- |
|
33 |
- |
55 |
10 |
- |
20 |
|
|
- |
|
37 |
- |
39 |
15 |
- |
15 |







Gu-Lin
and Zhang Ya Lan:
WBF Life Masters
9 times PABF Champions
3 times world*s runners-up
Sun Ming: WBF Life Master
8 times PABF Champions
2 times world*s runners-up
Liu Yi Qing: WBF Master
3 times PABF Champions
1 time world*s runners-up
Wang Ping: WBF Master
2 times PABF Champions
1 time world*s runners-up
Wang Jing: WBF Master
3 times PABF Champions
NPC – Wang Xiao Jing: WBF Master
1 time PABF Champion
13 National Champions
Coach – Ju Chuan Chen:
WBF Master
10 times PABF Champions

Youth
Series RR 2 –7
|
Bd 18 |
見 8743 |
|
|
Dlr E |
© AQ92 |
|
|
|
“ Q |
|
|
|
= K962 |
|
|
見 10 |
|
見 QJ62 |
|
© J8643 |
|
© 105 |
|
“ KJ10652 |
|
“ 973 |
|
= 7 |
|
= A1053 |
|
|
見 AK95 |
|
|
|
© K7 |
|
|
|
“ A84 |
|
|
|
= QJ84 |
|
West North East South
Dewi Gabby Wahyu Matthew
1=(1)
2NT(2) Dbl 3“ Pass
Pass 3© Pass 4見
Pass 5= All pass
(1)
Playing Weak NT
(2)
East to North = “+M
West to South = “+©
Final
Contract, 5= by South
Result, 11 tricks,
+600 NS
Statement
of Facts: The Australian NPC came to the TD after the match and told the TD
that on Board 15 the explanation was different at two sides of the screen. East explained to North that the 2NT bid
was “ + M.
On EW*s convention Card, 2NT jump overcall is
stated as two lower unbid suits. The subsequent bids now have different
meanings to N & S. The final
contract was 5= by South,
making. The Australian NPC said
they only discovered the erroneous explanation subsequently and claim damages. The TD determined North has misinformed
and damage had resulted. The TD, in
accordance with Law 21B3 and 40C, adjusted the
Decision of
the Appeal Committee: The Committee supports the TD*s
ruling and acknowledges that the damage was caused by the confusion in
explanation. However, players are advised to check with their opponents*
conventional card to prevent this kind of irregularity in the good spirit of
bridge.
The
Committee believes that in a 4見 contract, a singleton club lead may
hold it to ten tricks. However, in
the good spirit of the Law, the favourable result should be awarded and hence
the Committee agrees with the score adjusted by the TD.
Deposit returned.

BBO Vugraph Report for Friday – by Rick Wakeman
Well our spectator numbers were down
somewhat today and I made some mistakes.
My apologies for not being more organized for the play-offs. However,
the day was saved by four excellent young operators – 3 from the Japanese Youth
Team – Ruri Miss Ote; Yuichu, Ikemoto; and Motoaki,
Shiga and a wonderful young lady from Korea by the name of Ko
Jae-hyun.
They were simply great – once we managed to get the 4 tables up and
running, it was smooth sailing thanks to these fine youngsters and future stars
of the PABF. Dr. Hahn, Chairman of the 43rd PABF Championships asked me to
express his warm and heart felt gratitude for your world class contribution to
this event.
Our four table broadcast last night was
one of the few ever held on BBO and what is more significant is our numbers
were about 700 viewers when the European Championships from Tenerife came
on-line and we lost about 200 viewers.
So running side-by-side with the European Championships, who only had
one table on broadcast, we managed to split the BBO audience with them 50/50.
They had 500 viewers and we had the same.
I think tomorrow is going to be a red
letter day for the 43rd PABF BBO vugraph for many
reasons – the Indonesians are all primed to enjoy a day of watching their teams
perform, with commentary in their native language. Japan won*t be left out either – I am
hoping that we will broadcast several sessions in Japanese, featuring those
talented teams out of the Land of the Rising Sun.
Not only are the youth teams coming out
in force to operate the vugraph, but Steve Robinson
of the Singapore Open Team, Dagmar Neumann and
Jillian Hay of the Australian Women*s Team and Fu Zhong
of the powerhouse Chinese Open Team will taking their turn behind the monitor
to help us show the world that the PABF is where bridge is happening – BIG
TIME! Oh yeah - almost forgot – some guy that owns BBO
by the name of Fred Gitelman messaged me last night
to say he could tell he was missing the big party and asked if it was okay to drop
by and commentate a session or two.
What do you think? Should we
let him?
So when do you want me to slot you in
for a session of operating? If you
wait much longer you might have to pay me for the opportunity. Have a great day in this bridge heaven
called the 43rd PABF.
BBO STARS by Rick Wakeman
Here is an e-mail from Fred Gitelman of BBO that talks about how one qualifies to have
a star on their BBO profile. I
anyone is interested in further information, please feel free to contact me – you
likely can find me around the vugraph tables.
Hi Rick,
I hear the PABF vugraph
has been great – congrats and thanks! Most likely I will be around some time
this weekend to help with commentary.
Representing your country in certain
World Championship events is enough to qualify for a star regardless of your
results. The events that count are things like the Bermuda Bowl, and Olympiad. Events like the World Open Pairs and
the Rosenblum do not count (since anyone can play in
them). Women, Juniors and Seniors can qualify for
stars in this way as well (by playing in appropriate World Championship
events).
In addition, all new stars must agree to use their full real names and proper countries in their user profiles.
Winning one of the major events at a Zonal Championship (like the PABF) is another way to get a
star on BBO (as are winning ACBL National Events and major invitational
tournaments like the Cavendish.
Let me know if you have any more questions.
Regards,
Fred

Kumho
Tires – Major Sponsor of the 43rd PABF
Cathy Chua
Open
Series 2nd Round Robin Match 11
Board 18 saw a play I*ve missed since
Stephen Burgess moved back to NZ from
|
Bd 18 |
見 Q43 |
|
|
Dlr E |
© KQ5 |
|
|
|
“ A9752 |
|
|
|
= 86 |
|
|
見 KJ9 |
|
見 8762 |
|
© AJ74 |
|
© 632 |
|
“ J64 |
|
“ 10 |
|
= A42 |
|
= KJ1093 |
|
|
見 A105 |
|
|
|
© 1098 |
|
|
|
“ KQ83 |
|
|
|
= Q75 |
|
It was one of those 1NT 3NT auctions you
scrape together and then wish you hadn*t. Nakamura for
Another Burgess caper on board one:
|
Bd 1 |
見 K8764 |
|
|
Dlr N |
© A98 |
|
|
Vul Nil |
“ 87 |
|
|
|
= J85 |
|
|
見 Q |
|
見 10532 |
|
© 642 |
|
© KQ5 |
|
“ AQJ653 |
|
“ K1094 |
|
= 632 |
|
= Q7 |
|
|
見 AJ9 |
|
|
|
© J1073 |
|
|
|
“ 2 |
|
|
|
= AK1094 |
|
North*s 2見 opening was passed around to West. He balanced with 3“, and East, not sure what his hand was worth cued 3見. Burgess doubled, passed back to East who gave it another shot with redouble. But West had zero interest in game and bid 4“. This was passed around to Burgess who backed in with 4見. Double said West!!
|
west |
north |
east |
south |
|
Nakamura |
McLeish |
|
Burgess |
|
|
2見 |
Pass |
Pass! |
|
3“ |
Pass |
3見 |
Dble |
|
Pass |
Pass |
Redble |
Pass |
|
4“ |
Pass |
Pass |
4見 |
|
Dble |
All Pass |
|
|
East began with a trump, nine, queen, king. Now declarer ran the =J, it held: good news. Now he crossed to the spade ace: West showed out, bad news. He tried clubs from the top and East ruffed the third round. Now East continued the “K. His plan is to play another diamond next. If declarer ruffs that he*ll be down. If he pitches on it, to ruff the next diamond in hand, he*ll make. All irrelevant as West overtook the diamond – a play which is hard to understand as partner did not have to lead the king – and shifted to a heart. That was +590 to NZ.
In
Board 7 was another 3NT which didn*t seem to have nearly enough tricks.
|
Bd 7 |
見 10854 |
|
|
Dlr S |
© K4 |
|
|
Vul All |
“ K52 |
|
|
|
= KQJ6 |
|
|
見 AK632 |
|
見 Q |
|
© 983 |
|
© AJ75 |
|
“ A764 |
|
“ Q8 |
|
= 7 |
|
= A109543 |
|
|
見 J97 |
|
|
|
© Q1062 |
|
|
|
“ J1093 |
|
|
|
= 82 |
|
For NZ McLeish began with the =K. Declarer won and continued the suit, pitching a spade from hand. Next the ©K fed into dummy*s heart suit: ace of hearts and another club to North. Declarer didn*t have a chance and was one down, -100 and 3 IMPs away when 3NT failed by an extra trick in the other room.
In the Chinese Taipei vs
On board 10 when South was the declarer in 4© West could get into trouble’
|
Bd 10 |
見 A862 |
|
|
Dlr E |
© K98752 |
|
|
Vul All |
“ J76 |
|
|
|
= --- |
|
|
見 1097 |
|
見 J43 |
|
© J3 |
|
© A106 |
|
“ K8542 |
|
“ A93 |
|
= K95 |
|
= J743 |
|
|
見 KQ5 |
|
|
|
© Q4 |
|
|
|
“ Q10 |
|
|
|
= AQ10862 |
|
After Nagy opened 1= on the East cards for
In the other room Richman did super-well.
He won the spade lead in hand, heart to the queen and heart to the jack. Now he
won the spade continuation in dummy and tried a low club at no cost. West rose
king and that was the end of that. +620 and 12 IMPs
to
The Singapore West also found themselves on lead to 4© and began with the ©3’12 IMPs to HK when 4© failed in the other room.
A gin grand on board 13’.
|
Bd 13 |
見 AQ |
|
|
Dlr N |
© Q6 |
|
|
Vul All |
“ AKQ1042 |
|
|
|
= A43 |
|
|
見 9765 |
|
見 108 |
|
© 8753 |
|
© K10942 |
|
“ 5 |
|
“ J98 |
|
= KQ52 |
|
= J97 |
|
|
見 KJ432 |
|
|
|
© AJ |
|
|
|
“ 763 |
|
|
|
= 1086 |
|
’but who wants to bid a grand when nobody is
even bidding small slam? For a start it was always played by North, so the
heart lead is an issue. Only two pairs in the field bid to 6“. Richman-Gaspar picked up 12 IMPs for
I don*t know if that means the North field was showing this hand as a 2NT opening, but it is way too good for that!
Board 9 saw conservative part-scores mostly, but not everywhere’
|
Bd 15 |
見 J972 |
|
|
Dlr S |
© AK105 |
|
|
|
“ 9 |
|
|
|
= KJ86 |
|
|
見 Q10 |
|
見 AK843 |
|
© J62 |
|
© 7 |
|
“ AQ86 |
|
“ K42 |
|
= 10532 |
|
= AQ74 |
|
|
見 65 |
|
|
|
© Q9843 |
|
|
|
“ J10753 |
|
|
|
= 9 |
|
In China-Indonesia both teams played 3NT.
When West played it for
A sea of games failing on the next board, mostly 3NT, but a couple of imaginative major suit games, both hearts and spades going down’
|
Bd 3 |
見 A52 |
|
|
Dlr S |
© J74 |
|
|
Vul EW |
“ 83 |
|
|
|
= AKQ82 |
|
|
見 KJ |
|
見 Q1086 |
|
© Q62 |
|
© 1095 |
|
“ 97 |
|
“ AJ104 |
|
= J76543 |
|
= 109 |
|
|
見 9743 |
|
|
|
© AK83 |
|
|
|
“ KQ852 |
|
|
|
= --- |
|
North may only have been dummy in China-Indonesia, 3NT by South each time, but what happened on the board was all his fault.
After the auction begins, as it will, 1“ 2= 2“ the Chinese West heard North bid 2見 next, and so he led a heart to 3NT: 10 tricks, while the Indonesian West heard North rebid 2© and so he led a spade: one down and 10 IMPs to Indonesia in a match won by China 20-10 VPs.
Stage
one of the
Before I knew the scores I*d picked this board out as interesting:
|
Bd 7 |
見 10 |
|
|
Dlr S |
© KQ76 |
|
|
Vul All |
“ 10853 |
|
|
|
= K952 |
|
|
見 5 |
|
見 AKQ87643 |
|
© A9842 |
|
© J5 |
|
“ AKQJ |
|
“ 94 |
|
= 1083 |
|
= 4 |
|
|
見 J92 |
|
|
|
© 103 |
|
|
|
“ 762 |
|
|
|
= AQJ76 |
|
Not as it turned out. No-one got close as far as I can tell.
Board 16 had big fits for both sides on which to bid away:
|
Bd 16 |
見 AQJ9875 |
|
|
Dlr W |
© --- |
|
|
Vul EW |
“ AQJ42 |
|
|
|
= J |
|
|
見 |
|
見 106 |
|
© AKQ543 |
|
© J10862 |
|
“ K10 |
|
“ --- |
|
= 732 |
|
= AQ10954 |
|
|
見 43 |
|
|
|
© 97 |
|
|
|
“ 987653 |
|
|
|
= K86 |
|
But still nothing all that interesting
happened. In the Open match
There was an
inventiveness in the Youth match HK-CT on this board: against 5見 Wang for

Calculation: 1st choice
correct = 5 points
2nd
choice correct = 3 points
3rd
choice correct = 1 point
Total
score:
Tadayoshi:
5+5+3+5 = 18
Anthony:
5+8+0+5= 18
Bobby:
0+8+0+5 = 13
Dr. Hahn:5+0+0+5 = 10
Cathy:
0+5+0+0 = 5
The
winners: Tadayoshi and Anthony

Today*s Schedule